FirePro S9000 vs Quadro 4000

In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and Quadro 4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S9000

Quadro 4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	Quadro 4000
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	142 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 has 146% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000.
FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro 4000 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 425 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000 - by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro S9000 is 26 mm longer, than Quadro 4000.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 2692 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	6−7
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	16−18
medium / 1080p	40−45	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	55−60	12−14
ultra / 1080p	45−50	10−11
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	24−27
medium / 1080p	60−65	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	250−260	130−140
medium / 768p	220−230	110−120
ultra / 1080p	180−190	50−55
QHD / 1440p	110−120	27−30
4K / 2160p	70−75	27−30
high / 768p	210−220	80−85
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	120−130	80−85
medium / 768p	110−120	60−65
ultra / 1080p	100−110	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	45−50	8−9
ultra / 1080p	40−45	7−8
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	3−4
low / 720p	80−85	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	60−65	14−16
ultra / 1080p	45−50	10−11
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	60−65
medium / 1080p	110−120	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 277% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	60−65	12−14
ultra / 1080p	45−50	10−12
QHD / 1440p	30−35	1−2
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	24−27
medium / 1080p	65−70	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	140−150	50−55
medium / 768p	120−130	45−50
high / 1080p	70−75	12−14
ultra / 1080p	30−35	6−7
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	24−27	5−6
ultra / 1080p	20−22	3−4
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	12−14
medium / 1080p	30−35	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	130−140	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	120−130	90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	7−8
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	12−14
medium / 1080p	35−40	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	130−140	24−27
medium / 768p	85−90	16−18
high / 1080p	45−50	9−10
ultra / 1080p	24−27	6−7
4K / 2160p	16−18	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	45−50
ultra / 1080p	50−55	18−20
high / 768p	60−65	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Quadro 4000.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	Quadro 4000
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Tahiti	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 August 2012	2 November 2010
Pipelines	1792	256
Core clock speed	900 MHz	475 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	15.20
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	486.4 gflops
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	2808 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	89.86 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s	44 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 vs Quadro 4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares