FirePro S9000 vs Quadro K2200

When comparing FirePro S9000 and Quadro K2200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and Quadro K2200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro S9000

Quadro K2200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 has 414% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200.
FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 146 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
FirePro S9000 and Quadro K2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro S9000 is 65 mm longer, than Quadro K2200.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 488 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	18−20
ultra / 1080p	21−24	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	5−6
4K / 2160p	10−11	4−5
low / 720p	60−65	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Quadro K2200.
high / 1080p	55−60	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
QHD / 1440p	35−40	8−9
4K / 2160p	18−20	6−7
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Quadro K2200.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9000 and Quadro K2200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	220−230
medium / 768p	220−230	190−200
ultra / 1080p	180−190	110−120
QHD / 1440p	110−120	75−80
4K / 2160p	70−75	40−45
high / 768p	210−220	160−170
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Quadro K2200.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S9000 and Quadro K2200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Quadro K2200.
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	40−45	20−22
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	7−8
low / 720p	80−85	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Quadro K2200.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	14−16
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 77% more, than Quadro K2200.
high / 1080p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	30−35	10−12
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	65−70	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Quadro K2200.
low / 768p	140−150	95−100
medium / 768p	120−130	85−90
high / 1080p	70−75	35−40
ultra / 1080p	30−35	14−16
QHD / 1440p	21−24	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Quadro K2200.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−12
ultra / 1080p	20−22	9−10
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	2−3
low / 720p	65−70	35−40
medium / 1080p	30−35	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Quadro K2200.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Quadro K2200.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro K2200.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	35−40
medium / 1080p	35−40	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Quadro K2200.
low / 768p	130−140	65−70
medium / 768p	85−90	40−45
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	12−14
4K / 2160p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Quadro K2200.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Quadro K2200.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	Quadro K2200
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Tahiti	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 August 2012	22 July 2014
Pipelines	1792	640
Core clock speed	900 MHz	1046 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	44.96
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	1,439 gflops
Length	267 mm	202 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	80.19 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s	162 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		1.6 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 vs Quadro K2200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares