FirePro S9000 vs Quadro K4100M
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and Quadro K4100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and Quadro K4100M.
FirePro S9000
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro K4100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 250% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K4100M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K4100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 194 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- FirePro S9000 and Quadro K4100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 2300 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 142% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Quadro K4100M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro K4100M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tahiti | N15E-Q3-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1152 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 67.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 51 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |