FirePro S9000 vs Quadro K4200

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and Quadro K4200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against Quadro K4200, check out specs charts below.

FirePro S9000

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 has 224% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K4200.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 129 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
FirePro S9000 and Quadro K4200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro S9000 is 26 mm longer, than Quadro K4200.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 100 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
QHD / 1440p	16−18	7−8
4K / 2160p	10−11	5−6
low / 720p	60−65	40−45
medium / 1080p	40−45	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than Quadro K4200.
high / 1080p	55−60	35−40
ultra / 1080p	45−50	30−33
QHD / 1440p	35−40	14−16
4K / 2160p	18−20	9−10
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	60−65	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Quadro K4200.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9000 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	230−240
medium / 768p	220−230	200−210
ultra / 1080p	180−190	120−130
QHD / 1440p	110−120	100−105
4K / 2160p	70−75	55−60
high / 768p	210−220	170−180
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Quadro K4200.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S9000 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Quadro K4200.
high / 1080p	45−50	27−30
ultra / 1080p	40−45	24−27
QHD / 1440p	27−30	20−22
4K / 2160p	14−16	8−9
low / 720p	80−85	55−60
medium / 1080p	45−50	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Quadro K4200.
high / 1080p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
QHD / 1440p	27−30	16−18
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	130−140
medium / 1080p	110−120	75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Quadro K4200.
high / 1080p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
QHD / 1440p	30−35	16−18
4K / 2160p	24−27	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	65−70	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than Quadro K4200.
low / 768p	140−150	100−110
medium / 768p	120−130	95−100
high / 1080p	70−75	40−45
ultra / 1080p	30−35	18−20
QHD / 1440p	21−24	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than Quadro K4200.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	20−22	10−12
QHD / 1440p	16−18	10−12
4K / 2160p	8−9	3−4
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	30−35	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Quadro K4200.
low / 768p	130−140	120−130
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro K4200.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	75−80
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Quadro K4200.
high / 1080p	24−27	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−12
QHD / 1440p	10−11	2−3
4K / 2160p	7−8	2−3
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	35−40	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Quadro K4200.
low / 768p	130−140	80−85
medium / 768p	85−90	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	14−16
4K / 2160p	16−18	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 67% more, than Quadro K4200.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K4200.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	Quadro K4200
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Tahiti	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 August 2012	22 July 2014
Pipelines	1792	1344
Core clock speed	900 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock		784 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	87.81
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length	267 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s	119 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares