FirePro S9000 vs Quadro M1000M
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and Quadro M1000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and Quadro M1000M.
FirePro S9000
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 775% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M1000M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 93 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and Quadro M1000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 500 MHz higher, than Quadro M1000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 123% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 97% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Quadro M1000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tahiti | GM107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 31.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 140 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |