FirePro S9000 vs Quadro M4000M
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M.
FirePro S9000
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro M4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 250% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 75 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 488 MHz higher, than Quadro M4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| FirePro S9000 and Quadro M4000M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro M4000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tahiti | GM204 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1,280 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 78.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 251 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |