FirePro S9000 vs Radeon 520
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and Radeon 520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon 520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon 520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 600% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon 520.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 and Radeon 520 are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 130 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 and Radeon 520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3250 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon 520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon 520 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 520% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon 520. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon 520 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tahiti | Oland |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,040 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |