FirePro S9000 vs Radeon HD 8750M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and Radeon HD 8750M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon HD 8750M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8750M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8750M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 280 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- FirePro S9000 and Radeon HD 8750M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3500 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 1083% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and Radeon HD 8750M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 211% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| FirePro S9000 and Radeon HD 8750M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Tahiti | Mars Pro |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 16 November 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 18.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 2000 - 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 71 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |