FirePro S9000 vs Radeon Pro 560X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro 560X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro 560X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
Radeon Pro 560X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 366% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 560X.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 560X is 7 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 420 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 92% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 79% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 74% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 560X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro 560X | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Tahiti | Polaris 21 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 5 June 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 64.26 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |