FirePro S9000 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro W5500M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro W5500M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S9000

Radeon Pro W5500M

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	Radeon Pro W5500M
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	85 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

FirePro S9000 has 311% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 6500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	14−16
ultra / 1080p	21−24	8−9
QHD / 1440p	16−18	3−4
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	30−33
medium / 1080p	40−45	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	55−60	21−24
ultra / 1080p	45−50	20−22
QHD / 1440p	35−40	6−7
4K / 2160p	18−20	5−6
low / 720p	100−110	50−55
medium / 1080p	60−65	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	250−260	200−210
medium / 768p	220−230	170−180
ultra / 1080p	180−190	95−100
QHD / 1440p	110−120	50−55
4K / 2160p	70−75	30−33
high / 768p	210−220	130−140
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	35−40
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	120−130	100−110
medium / 768p	110−120	90−95
ultra / 1080p	100−110	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	45−50	16−18
ultra / 1080p	40−45	14−16
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	6−7
low / 720p	80−85	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	60−65	24−27
ultra / 1080p	45−50	18−20
QHD / 1440p	27−30	16−18
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	95−100
medium / 1080p	110−120	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 107% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	60−65	24−27
ultra / 1080p	45−50	18−20
QHD / 1440p	30−35	8−9
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	50−55
medium / 1080p	65−70	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	140−150	80−85
medium / 768p	120−130	70−75
high / 1080p	70−75	27−30
ultra / 1080p	30−35	12−14
QHD / 1440p	21−24	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	24−27	9−10
ultra / 1080p	20−22	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	2−3
low / 720p	65−70	27−30
medium / 1080p	30−35	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	120−130	100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	27−30
medium / 1080p	35−40	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	130−140	50−55
medium / 768p	85−90	30−35
high / 1080p	45−50	18−20
ultra / 1080p	24−27	10−11
4K / 2160p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	30−35
high / 768p	60−65	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon Pro W5500M.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	Radeon Pro W5500M
Architecture	GCN 1.0	RDNA 1.0
Code name	Tahiti	Navi 14
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 August 2012	10 February 2020
Pipelines	1792	1408
Core clock speed	900 MHz
Boost Clock		1450 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	127.6
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+

FirePro S9000 vs Radeon Pro W5500M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares