FirePro S9000 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro WX 4130. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon Pro WX 4130. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
Radeon Pro WX 4130 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4130 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4130 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 4130.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - with Polaris.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4130 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4130 is 1500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 155% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4130. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Tahiti | Polaris |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |