FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and Radeon R6 Carrizo you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R6 Carrizo will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
Radeon R6 Carrizo is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R6 Carrizo is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R6 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon R6 Carrizo | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 12-35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 2816% more power consumption, than Radeon R6 Carrizo.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R6 Carrizo - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R6 Carrizo - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- FirePro S9000 and Radeon R6 Carrizo are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 210% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R6 Carrizo in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro S9000. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1375% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 453% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 1566% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1116% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R6 Carrizo. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon R6 Carrizo | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Code name | Tahiti | Carrizo |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 4 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 2410 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |