FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R7 M365X

In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S9000

Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	Radeon R7 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M365X.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 and Radeon R7 M365X are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
FirePro S9000 and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 4500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	0−1
ultra / 1080p	21−24	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	10−12
medium / 1080p	40−45	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	55−60	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	3−4
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	12−14
medium / 1080p	60−65	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9000 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	110−120
medium / 768p	220−230	85−90
ultra / 1080p	180−190	35−40
QHD / 1440p	110−120	−
4K / 2160p	70−75	10−11
high / 768p	210−220	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
FirePro S9000 and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	70−75
medium / 768p	110−120	40−45
ultra / 1080p	100−110	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	45−50	2−3
ultra / 1080p	40−45	2−3
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	0−1
low / 720p	80−85	9−10
medium / 1080p	45−50	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	45−50	5−6
QHD / 1440p	27−30	1−2
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	45−50
medium / 1080p	110−120	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	60−65	2−3
ultra / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	30−35	0−1
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	14−16
medium / 1080p	65−70	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	140−150	40−45
medium / 768p	120−130	−
high / 1080p	70−75	3−4
ultra / 1080p	30−35	2−3
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	24−27	1−2
ultra / 1080p	20−22	0−1
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	2−3
medium / 1080p	30−35	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	130−140	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
medium / 1080p	120−130	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	3−4
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	4−5
medium / 1080p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	130−140	7−8
medium / 768p	85−90	6−7
high / 1080p	45−50	3−4
ultra / 1080p	24−27	−
4K / 2160p	16−18	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	50−55	12−14
high / 768p	60−65	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	Radeon R7 M365X
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Tahiti	Litho
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	24 August 2012	5 May 2015
Pipelines	1792	384
Core clock speed	900 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	23.04
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	737.3 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		6
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+

FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares