FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX 5500M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 5500M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 5500M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S9000
Radeon RX 5500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 5500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 5500M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 5500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 311% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 5500M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 5500M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 5500M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 5500M - with Navi / RDNA.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 5500M is 427 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 5500M is 8500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 5500M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 61% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 64% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 49% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon RX 5500M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 5500M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Navi / RDNA |
| Code name | Tahiti | Navi 14 / R19M-E85 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 29 September 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1408 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1327 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 6,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 144.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |