FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX 640
In this comparison between FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX 640 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 640 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S9000
Radeon RX 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 640 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 600% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 640.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 640.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 640 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 640 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 318 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 414% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 385% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 313% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 364% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 21−24 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than Radeon RX 640. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX 640 | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Tahiti | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 12 August 2019 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1218 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 38.98 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |