FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX Vega 6
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega 6, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against Radeon RX Vega 6, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S9000
Radeon RX Vega 6 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 6 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 6 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX Vega 6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 6 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 6 - with Vega.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 6 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega 6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−105 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 383% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 257% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 46% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon RX Vega 6. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX Vega 6 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
| Code name | Tahiti | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 7 January 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |