FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX Vega 9
When comparing FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega 9, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega 9 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
Radeon RX Vega 9 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega 9 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega 9 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX Vega 9 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - with Vega.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 9 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 123% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Radeon RX Vega 9. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX Vega 9 | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
| Code name | Tahiti | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 26 October 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |