FirePro S9000 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
When choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH.
FirePro S9000
Radeon RX Vega M GH is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GH is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GH here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 250% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GH uses IGP interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - with Vega.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GH is 163 MHz higher, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GH - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 3900 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GH.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
FirePro S9000 and Radeon RX Vega M GH have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon RX Vega M GH | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Vega |
Code name | Tahiti | Vega Kaby Lake-G |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 7 January 2018 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 114.2 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 3,656 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro S9000 vs Radeon R9 M295X
- FirePro S9000 vs P106 100
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Radeon R9 M295X
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs P106 100
- FirePro S9000 vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- FirePro S9000 vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs GeForce GTX 1050 3GB mobile
- Radeon RX Vega M GH vs Quadro T1000 Max Q