FirePro S9000 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing FirePro S9000 and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- FirePro S9000 has 55% more power consumption, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S9000 and Tesla M2070 Q have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- FirePro S9000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- FirePro S9000 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 2368 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
Code name | Tahiti | GF100 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | 248 mm |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |