FirePro S9050 vs GRID M60 2Q

When choosing between FirePro S9050 and GRID M60 2Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9050 and GRID M60 2Q.

FirePro S9050 Check Price

GRID M60 2Q

Main Specs

	FirePro S9050	GRID M60 2Q
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro S9050 has 10 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 343 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
FirePro S9050 and GRID M60 2Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
GRID M60 2Q is 13 mm longer, than FirePro S9050.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 488 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	6−7	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	10−11
low / 720p	35−40	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	30−35	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	45−50
QHD / 1440p	10−12	35−40
4K / 2160p	7−8	18−20
low / 720p	65−70	100−110
medium / 1080p	35−40	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9050 and GRID M60 2Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	250−260
medium / 768p	200−210	220−230
ultra / 1080p	110−120	180−190
QHD / 1440p	85−90	110−120
4K / 2160p	45−50	70−75
high / 768p	160−170	210−220
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S9050 and GRID M60 2Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 10% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	24−27	45−50
ultra / 1080p	21−24	40−45
QHD / 1440p	18−20	27−30
4K / 2160p	7−8	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	80−85
medium / 1080p	27−30	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	45−50
QHD / 1440p	14−16	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	120−130	180−190
medium / 1080p	70−75	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 61% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	45−50
QHD / 1440p	12−14	30−35
4K / 2160p	12−14	24−27
low / 720p	65−70	100−110
medium / 1080p	35−40	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	100−110	140−150
medium / 768p	90−95	120−130
high / 1080p	40−45	70−75
ultra / 1080p	16−18	30−35
QHD / 1440p	7−8	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	20−22
QHD / 1440p	10−11	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	16−18	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	120−130	130−140
medium / 1080p	110−120	120−130
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro S9050.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	1−2	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	65−70
medium / 1080p	20−22	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	70−75	130−140
medium / 768p	45−50	85−90
high / 1080p	24−27	45−50
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
4K / 2160p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
high / 768p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro S9050.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9050	GRID M60 2Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Tahiti	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 August 2014	30 August 2015
Pipelines	1792	2048
Core clock speed	900 MHz	557 MHz
Boost Clock		1178 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	150.8
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	4,833 gflops
Length	254 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.2
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Form factor	full height / full length
	Check Price

FirePro S9050 vs GRID M60 2Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares