FirePro S9050 vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9050 and Iris Plus Graphics 650, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9050 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 650, check out specs charts below.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9050
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro S9050 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 20 GB more memory, than FirePro S9050.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
8−9
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
27−30
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−33
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
230−240
150−160
medium / 768p
200−210
120−130
ultra / 1080p
110−120
60−65
QHD / 1440p
85−90
35−40
4K / 2160p
45−50
27−30
high / 768p
160−170
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 71% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
medium / 768p
100−110
65−70
ultra / 1080p
80−85
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 60% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
21−24
9−10
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
27−30
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 145% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
30−35
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
65−70
medium / 1080p
70−75
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 103% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
12−14
2−3
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
30−35
medium / 1080p
35−40
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
100−110
60−65
medium / 768p
90−95
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
7−8
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−11
4−5
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
40−45
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 183% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
120−130
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
20−22
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
70−75
30−35
medium / 768p
45−50
20−22
high / 1080p
24−27
10−12
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
high / 768p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Full Specs
FirePro S9050
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
Tahiti
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
7 August 2014
3 January 2017
Pipelines
1792
48
Core clock speed
900 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
55.20
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
883 gflops
Length
254 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.103
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
full height / full length
Check Price
Check Price
