FirePro S9050 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
When comparing FirePro S9050 and Iris Pro Graphics P580, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9050 and Iris Pro Graphics P580 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9050
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
64 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro S9050 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 52 GB more memory, than FirePro S9050.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - in Laptops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics P580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
10−11
ultra / 1080p
12−14
6−7
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
24−27
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
30−35
16−18
ultra / 1080p
27−30
14−16
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
35−40
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
230−240
170−180
medium / 768p
200−210
140−150
ultra / 1080p
110−120
70−75
QHD / 1440p
85−90
40−45
4K / 2160p
45−50
30−33
high / 768p
160−170
100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
120−130
90−95
medium / 768p
100−110
75−80
ultra / 1080p
80−85
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 44% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
24−27
10−12
ultra / 1080p
21−24
10−12
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
27−30
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 107% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
30−35
18−20
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
75−80
medium / 1080p
70−75
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
30−35
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
QHD / 1440p
12−14
4−5
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
35−40
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
100−110
65−70
medium / 768p
90−95
55−60
high / 1080p
40−45
18−20
ultra / 1080p
16−18
8−9
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
40−45
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 112% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
ultra / 1080p
−
90−95
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
20−22
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
70−75
35−40
medium / 768p
45−50
21−24
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
8−9
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
50−55
ultra / 1080p
40−45
24−27
high / 768p
55−60
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
Full Specs
FirePro S9050
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Gen. 9 Skylake
Code name
Tahiti
Skylake GT4e
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
7 August 2014
1 September 2015
Pipelines
1792
72
Core clock speed
900 MHz
350 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
75.60
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
Length
254 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.97
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
full height / full length
Check Price
Check Price
