FirePro S9050 vs Quadro 4000

In this comparison between FirePro S9050 and Quadro 4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9050 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S9050 Check Price

Quadro 4000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9050	Quadro 4000
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	142 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 has 58% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 4000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9050 has 10 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro 4000 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 425 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 4000 - by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro S9050 is 13 mm longer, than Quadro 4000.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 2692 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	6−7
ultra / 1080p	12−14	4−5
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	16−18
medium / 1080p	24−27	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	30−35	12−14
ultra / 1080p	27−30	10−11
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	24−27
medium / 1080p	35−40	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	230−240	130−140
medium / 768p	200−210	110−120
ultra / 1080p	110−120	50−55
QHD / 1440p	85−90	27−30
4K / 2160p	45−50	27−30
high / 768p	160−170	80−85
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	120−130	80−85
medium / 768p	100−110	60−65
ultra / 1080p	80−85	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	24−27	8−9
ultra / 1080p	21−24	7−8
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	3−4
low / 720p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	27−30	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	30−35	14−16
ultra / 1080p	24−27	10−11
QHD / 1440p	14−16	−
low / 720p	120−130	60−65
medium / 1080p	70−75	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 133% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	30−35	12−14
ultra / 1080p	24−27	10−12
QHD / 1440p	12−14	1−2
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	24−27
medium / 1080p	35−40	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 169% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	100−110	50−55
medium / 768p	90−95	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	6−7
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	12−14	5−6
ultra / 1080p	10−11	3−4
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	12−14
medium / 1080p	16−18	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 185% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	120−130	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	110−120	90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	7−8
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	12−14
medium / 1080p	20−22	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 130% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	70−75	24−27
medium / 768p	45−50	16−18
high / 1080p	24−27	9−10
ultra / 1080p	14−16	6−7
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	45−50
ultra / 1080p	40−45	18−20
high / 768p	55−60	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Quadro 4000.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9050	Quadro 4000
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Tahiti	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 August 2014	2 November 2010
Pipelines	1792	256
Core clock speed	900 MHz	475 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	15.20
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	486.4 gflops
Length	254 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	2808 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	89.86 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		44 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 vs Quadro 4000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares