FirePro S9050 vs Quadro FX 5800

When comparing FirePro S9050 and Quadro FX 5800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9050 and Quadro FX 5800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro S9050 Check Price

Quadro FX 5800 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9050	Quadro FX 5800
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	189 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 has 19% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 5800.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 5800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9050 has 8 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 5800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro FX 5800 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 290 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 5800 - by 55 nm process technology.
Quadro FX 5800 is 13 mm longer, than FirePro S9050.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 3900 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 5800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	3−4
ultra / 1080p	12−14	1−2
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	24−27	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	30−35	8−9
ultra / 1080p	27−30	6−7
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	20−22
medium / 1080p	35−40	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	230−240	120−130
medium / 768p	200−210	95−100
ultra / 1080p	110−120	45−50
QHD / 1440p	85−90	24−27
4K / 2160p	45−50	−
high / 768p	160−170	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	50−55	20−22
medium / 1080p	55−60	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	120−130	75−80
medium / 768p	100−110	55−60
ultra / 1080p	80−85	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	24−27	4−5
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
low / 720p	50−55	14−16
medium / 1080p	27−30	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	30−35	12−14
ultra / 1080p	24−27	7−8
QHD / 1440p	14−16	4−5
low / 720p	120−130	55−60
medium / 1080p	70−75	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 184% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	30−35	7−8
ultra / 1080p	24−27	6−7
QHD / 1440p	12−14	0−1
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	21−24
medium / 1080p	35−40	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 263% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	100−110	50−55
medium / 768p	90−95	−
high / 1080p	40−45	9−10
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	12−14	2−3
ultra / 1080p	10−11	0−1
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	8−9
medium / 1080p	16−18	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 380% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	120−130	85−90
high / 1080p	−	65−70
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	70−75	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
high / 1080p	14−16	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	8−9
medium / 1080p	20−22	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	70−75	18−20
medium / 768p	45−50	12−14
high / 1080p	24−27	6−7
ultra / 1080p	14−16	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than Quadro FX 5800.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	40−45	16−18
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 61% more, than Quadro FX 5800.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9050	Quadro FX 5800
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Tahiti	GT200B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 August 2014	11 November 2008
Pipelines	1792	240
Core clock speed	900 MHz	610 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	48.80
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	622.1 gflops
Length	254 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	102.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.1	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		1.3
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Form factor	full height / full length
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 vs Quadro FX 5800

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares