FirePro S9050 vs Quadro K4200

When choosing between FirePro S9050 and Quadro K4200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9050 and Quadro K4200.

FirePro S9050 Check Price

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9050	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 has 108% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9050 has 8 GB more memory, than Quadro K4200.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 129 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
FirePro S9050 and Quadro K4200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro S9050 is 13 mm longer, than Quadro K4200.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 100 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
QHD / 1440p	6−7	7−8
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	24−27	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	30−33
QHD / 1440p	10−12	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	9−10
low / 720p	65−70	70−75
medium / 1080p	35−40	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9050 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	230−240
medium / 768p	200−210	200−210
ultra / 1080p	110−120	120−130
QHD / 1440p	85−90	100−105
4K / 2160p	45−50	55−60
high / 768p	160−170	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S9050 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	24−27
QHD / 1440p	18−20	20−22
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	27−30	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	24−27	27−30
QHD / 1440p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	120−130	130−140
medium / 1080p	70−75	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 9% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	24−27	27−30
QHD / 1440p	12−14	16−18
4K / 2160p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	70−75
medium / 1080p	35−40	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
medium / 768p	90−95	95−100
high / 1080p	40−45	40−45
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
QHD / 1440p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−12
QHD / 1440p	10−11	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	40−45	40−45
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 6% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
FirePro S9050 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	75−80
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−12
QHD / 1440p	1−2	2−3
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	20−22	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	70−75	80−85
medium / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
4K / 2160p	8−9	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	40−45
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S9050 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9050	Quadro K4200
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Tahiti	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 August 2014	22 July 2014
Pipelines	1792	1344
Core clock speed	900 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock		784 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	87.81
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length	254 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		119 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares