FirePro S9050 vs Quadro M500M

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9050 and Quadro M500M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9050 and Quadro M500M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro S9050 Check Price

Quadro M500M Check Price

Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:

Quadro M500M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro S9050	Quadro M500M
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro S9050 has 10 GB more memory, than Quadro M500M.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 129 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.
FirePro S9050 and Quadro M500M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 1496 MHz higher, than Quadro M500M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	0−1
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	12−14
medium / 1080p	24−27	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 287% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	30−35	5−6
ultra / 1080p	27−30	4−5
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	16−18
medium / 1080p	35−40	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 412% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
FirePro S9050 and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	110−120
medium / 768p	200−210	85−90
ultra / 1080p	110−120	40−45
QHD / 1440p	85−90	35−40
4K / 2160p	45−50	18−20
high / 768p	160−170	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 132% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	120−130	70−75
medium / 768p	100−110	50−55
ultra / 1080p	80−85	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 108% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	24−27	1−2
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	10−12
medium / 1080p	27−30	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	30−35	9−10
ultra / 1080p	24−27	5−6
QHD / 1440p	14−16	1−2
low / 720p	120−130	50−55
medium / 1080p	70−75	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 237% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	30−35	6−7
ultra / 1080p	24−27	4−5
QHD / 1440p	12−14	0−1
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	18−20
medium / 1080p	35−40	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 344% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	100−110	45−50
medium / 768p	90−95	35−40
high / 1080p	40−45	6−7
ultra / 1080p	16−18	3−4
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	12−14	1−2
ultra / 1080p	10−11	0−1
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	6−7
medium / 1080p	16−18	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	120−130	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	70−75	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro M500M.
high / 1080p	14−16	5−6
ultra / 1080p	10−11	3−4
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	6−7
medium / 1080p	20−22	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	70−75	14−16
medium / 768p	45−50	10−11
high / 1080p	24−27	5−6
ultra / 1080p	14−16	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Quadro M500M.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	40−45	14−16
high / 768p	55−60	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro M500M.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9050	Quadro M500M
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Tahiti	GM108
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 August 2014	15 December 2015
Pipelines	1792	384
Core clock speed	900 MHz	1029 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	17.98
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length	254 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	4004 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Form factor	full height / full length
nView Display Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 vs Quadro M500M

Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares