Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro S9050 vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

    In this comparison between FirePro S9050 and Quadro T2000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9050 will be the best choice, for others Quadro T2000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    FirePro S9050 Check Price
    Quadro T2000 Max Q Check Price

    Quadro T2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro T2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 Max Q here:

    Quadro T2000 Max Q Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro S9050 Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 40 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors 1x DisplayPort No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro S9050 has 462% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
    • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
    • FirePro S9050 has 8 GB more memory, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
    • FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
    • FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 30 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.
    • FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 2500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 20−22 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 12−14 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 6−7 16−18
    4K / 2160p 5−6 10−11
    low / 720p 35−40 60−65
    medium / 1080p 24−27 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than FirePro S9050.

    Full Specs

      FirePro S9050 Quadro T2000 Max Q
    Architecture GCN 1.0 Turing
    Code name Tahiti N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 7 August 2014 27 May 2019
    Pipelines 1792 1024
    Core clock speed 900 MHz 930 / 1200 MHz
    Boost Clock 1500 / 1620 MHz
    Transistor count 4,313 million 4,700 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 12 nm
    Texture fill rate 100.8 103.7
    Floating-point performance 3,226 gflops
    Length 254 mm
    Memory bus width 384 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5500 MHz 8000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 264 GB/s 128.0 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (11_1) 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 5.1 6.5
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2.131
    CUDA 7.5
    Bus support PCIe 3.0
    Laptop size medium sized
    Form factor full height / full length
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares