FirePro S9050 vs Radeon 630

In this comparison between FirePro S9050 and Radeon 630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9050 will be the best choice, for others Radeon 630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S9050 Check Price

Radeon 630 Check Price

Radeon 630 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon 630 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 630 here:

Radeon 630 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro S9050	Radeon 630
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon 630.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
FirePro S9050 has 8 GB more memory, than Radeon 630.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Radeon 630 - in Laptops.
FirePro S9050 and Radeon 630 are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon 630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon 630 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	3−4
ultra / 1080p	12−14	1−2
QHD / 1440p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	24−27	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon 630.
high / 1080p	30−35	8−9
ultra / 1080p	27−30	6−7
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	21−24
medium / 1080p	35−40	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p	230−240	120−130
medium / 768p	200−210	100−110
ultra / 1080p	110−120	45−50
QHD / 1440p	85−90	24−27
4K / 2160p	45−50	−
high / 768p	160−170	75−80
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	50−55	20−22
medium / 1080p	55−60	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p	120−130	75−80
medium / 768p	100−110	55−60
ultra / 1080p	80−85	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than Radeon 630.
high / 1080p	24−27	4−5
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
low / 720p	50−55	14−16
medium / 1080p	27−30	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Radeon 630.
high / 1080p	30−35	12−14
ultra / 1080p	24−27	7−8
QHD / 1440p	14−16	4−5
low / 720p	120−130	55−60
medium / 1080p	70−75	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 184% more, than Radeon 630.
high / 1080p	30−35	7−8
ultra / 1080p	24−27	6−7
QHD / 1440p	12−14	0−1
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	21−24
medium / 1080p	35−40	10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 263% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p	100−110	50−55
medium / 768p	90−95	−
high / 1080p	40−45	9−10
ultra / 1080p	16−18	4−5
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Radeon 630.
high / 1080p	12−14	2−3
ultra / 1080p	10−11	0−1
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	8−9
medium / 1080p	16−18	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 380% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p	120−130	85−90
high / 1080p	−	70−75
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon 630.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	70−75	30−33
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Radeon 630.
high / 1080p	14−16	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−11	4−5
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	8−9
medium / 1080p	20−22	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p	70−75	18−20
medium / 768p	45−50	12−14
high / 1080p	24−27	6−7
ultra / 1080p	14−16	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than Radeon 630.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	40−45
ultra / 1080p	40−45	16−18
high / 768p	55−60	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Radeon 630.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9050	Radeon 630
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Tahiti	Lexa
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	7 August 2014	12 August 2019
Pipelines	1792	512
Core clock speed	900 MHz
Boost Clock		1219 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops
Length	254 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	DirectX 12, Shader 5.0
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Form factor	full height / full length
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 vs Radeon 630

Radeon 630 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares