FirePro S9050 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When choosing between FirePro S9050 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro S9050 and Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9050
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro S9050 has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
FirePro S9050 has 10 GB more memory, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
7−8
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
27−30
10−12
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
230−240
140−150
medium / 768p
200−210
110−120
ultra / 1080p
110−120
55−60
QHD / 1440p
85−90
30−35
4K / 2160p
45−50
27−30
high / 768p
160−170
85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
medium / 768p
100−110
60−65
ultra / 1080p
80−85
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 67% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
24−27
9−10
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
27−30
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 145% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
30−35
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−12
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
65−70
medium / 1080p
70−75
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 110% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
12−14
2−3
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
100−110
55−60
medium / 768p
90−95
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
7−8
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−11
3−4
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 185% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
120−130
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
20−22
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
70−75
27−30
medium / 768p
45−50
18−20
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
high / 768p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
Full Specs
FirePro S9050
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Polaris
Code name
Tahiti
Polaris 12
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
7 August 2014
21 March 2018
Pipelines
1792
512
Core clock speed
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
39.01
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
1,248 gflops
Length
254 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Laptop size
large
Form factor
full height / full length
Check Price
Check Price
