FirePro S9050 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
In this comparison between FirePro S9050 and Radeon Pro WX 3200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9050 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 3200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9050
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro S9050 has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
FirePro S9050 has 8 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 182 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
12−14
ultra / 1080p
12−14
7−8
QHD / 1440p
6−7
2−3
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
30−35
21−24
ultra / 1080p
27−30
18−20
QHD / 1440p
10−12
4−5
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
35−40
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 52% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
230−240
190−200
medium / 768p
200−210
160−170
ultra / 1080p
110−120
85−90
QHD / 1440p
85−90
50−55
4K / 2160p
45−50
30−33
high / 768p
160−170
120−130
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
35−40
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
medium / 768p
100−110
85−90
ultra / 1080p
80−85
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
5−6
low / 720p
50−55
30−35
medium / 1080p
27−30
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 58% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
30−35
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
16−18
QHD / 1440p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
120−130
90−95
medium / 1080p
70−75
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 38% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
30−35
21−24
ultra / 1080p
24−27
18−20
QHD / 1440p
12−14
7−8
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
45−50
medium / 1080p
35−40
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
medium / 768p
90−95
65−70
high / 1080p
40−45
24−27
ultra / 1080p
16−18
10−12
QHD / 1440p
7−8
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
12−14
8−9
ultra / 1080p
10−11
6−7
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
2−3
low / 720p
40−45
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 70% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
ultra / 1080p
−
100−105
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
70−75
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
27−30
high / 1080p
24−27
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−11
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
30−35
high / 768p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Full Specs
FirePro S9050
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Polaris
Code name
Tahiti
Polaris 12
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
7 August 2014
26 September 2019
Pipelines
1792
640
Core clock speed
900 MHz
1082 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
41.44
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
Length
254 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
full height / full length
Check Price
Check Price