FirePro S9050 vs Tesla C2075

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S9050 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S9050 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro S9050 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9050	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 9% more power consumption, than FirePro S9050.
FirePro S9050 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S9050 has 6 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 326 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro S9050 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro S9050 is 6 mm longer, than Tesla C2075.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 2368 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
QHD / 1440p	6−7	4−5
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	24−27	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
QHD / 1440p	10−12	6−7
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
low / 720p	65−70	55−60
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9050 and Tesla C2075 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	210−220
medium / 768p	200−210	190−200
ultra / 1080p	110−120	100−110
QHD / 1440p	85−90	65−70
4K / 2160p	45−50	30−35
high / 768p	160−170	150−160
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	80−85	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	18−20	18−20
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	27−30	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	70−75	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	12−14	10−11
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	60−65
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	90−95	80−85
high / 1080p	40−45	30−35
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
QHD / 1440p	7−8	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	12−14	10−12
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2075.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2075.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
medium / 768p	45−50	35−40
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Tesla C2075.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9050	Tesla C2075
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Tahiti	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 August 2014	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1792	448
Core clock speed	900 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	32.14
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	254 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		94 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares