FirePro M4000 vs FirePro V4900
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and FirePro V4900 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others FirePro V4900 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000
FirePro V4900
Power consumption (TDP)
33 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V4900 has 127% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and FirePro V4900 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro M4000 and FirePro V4900 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro V4900 - in Desktops.
FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and FirePro V4900 - with TeraScale 2.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FirePro V4900 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
2−3
ultra / 1080p
4−5
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
12−14
medium / 1080p
9−10
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
12−14
6−7
ultra / 1080p
10−12
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
16−18
medium / 1080p
14−16
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
35−40
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
140−150
110−120
medium / 768p
120−130
90−95
ultra / 1080p
55−60
40−45
QHD / 1440p
30−35
24−27
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
90−95
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
55−60
75−80
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro M4000.
low / 768p
85−90
70−75
medium / 768p
65−70
50−55
ultra / 1080p
35−40
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 28% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
9−10
3−4
ultra / 1080p
8−9
2−3
4K / 2160p
4−5
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
12−14
medium / 1080p
10−11
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 120% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
16−18
10−12
ultra / 1080p
10−12
6−7
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
65−70
50−55
medium / 1080p
27−30
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 55% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
14−16
7−8
ultra / 1080p
12−14
6−7
QHD / 1440p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
16−18
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 87% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
55−60
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
35−40
high / 1080p
14−16
6−7
ultra / 1080p
7−8
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
5−6
2−3
ultra / 1080p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
5−6
medium / 1080p
7−8
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
high / 1080p
90−95
60−65
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 26% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
8−9
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
14−16
6−7
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
27−30
12−14
medium / 768p
18−20
10−11
high / 1080p
10−11
5−6
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
14−16
high / 768p
35−40
30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro M4000
FirePro V4900
Architecture
GCN
TeraScale 2
Code name
Cape Verde GLM
Turks
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 July 2012
1 November 2011
Pipelines
512
480
Core clock speed
600 MHz
800 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
716 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
19.20
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
768.0 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4500 MHz
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.0
OpenGL
4.6
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
Bus support
n/a
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
73 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Form factor
MXM-A
StereoOutput3D
+
Check Price
Check Price
