FirePro V4900 vs GeForce GTX 965M
In this comparison between FirePro V4900 and GeForce GTX 965M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V4900 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 965M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
GeForce GTX 965M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 965M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
GeForce GTX 965M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 965M - in Laptops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 965M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 144 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 965M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 1500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 965M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
20−22
ultra / 1080p
1−2
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
30−35
ultra / 1080p
5−6
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
16−18
65−70
medium / 1080p
6−7
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 412% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V4900 and GeForce GTX 965M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
230−240
medium / 768p
90−95
200−210
ultra / 1080p
40−45
110−120
QHD / 1440p
24−27
85−90
4K / 2160p
−
45−50
high / 768p
65−70
160−170
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 136% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 104% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
24−27
ultra / 1080p
2−3
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
low / 720p
12−14
50−55
medium / 1080p
4−5
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 440% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
120−130
medium / 1080p
12−14
70−75
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 217% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
24−27
QHD / 1440p
1−2
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
18−20
65−70
medium / 1080p
9−10
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
90−95
high / 1080p
6−7
40−45
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
5−6
40−45
medium / 1080p
3−4
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
60−65
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 43% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
1−2
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
6−7
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
70−75
medium / 768p
10−11
45−50
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 371% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
GeForce GTX 965M
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Maxwell
Code name
Turks
N16E-GS, N16E-GR
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 November 2011
5 January 2015
Pipelines
480
1024
Core clock speed
800 MHz
944 MHz
Boost Clock
950 / 1151 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
73.60
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
2,355 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
G-SYNC support
+
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
1024
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
226 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
GameStream
+
GeForce ShadowPlay
+
GPU Boost
2.0
GameWorks
+
BatteryBoost
+
Check Price
Check Price