FirePro V4900 vs GRID K240Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V4900 and GRID K240Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V4900 stacks up against GRID K240Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
GRID K240Q
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
GRID K240Q has 200% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro V4900 and GRID K240Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 55 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
1−2
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
4−5
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
110−120
170−180
medium / 768p
90−95
140−150
ultra / 1080p
40−45
75−80
QHD / 1440p
24−27
40−45
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
65−70
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
70−75
95−100
medium / 768p
50−55
75−80
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 48% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
12−14
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
27−30
medium / 1080p
4−5
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 180% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
50−55
75−80
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 85% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
65−70
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
high / 1080p
6−7
20−22
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
7−8
ultra / 1080p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
5−6
20−22
medium / 1080p
3−4
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
−
90−95
medium / 1080p
−
100−105
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
20−22
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
35−40
medium / 768p
10−11
24−27
high / 1080p
5−6
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
14−16
27−30
high / 768p
30−33
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
GRID K240Q
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Kepler
Code name
Turks
GK104
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 November 2011
28 June 2013
Pipelines
480
1536
Core clock speed
800 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
95.36
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
2,289 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
Check Price
