FirePro V4900 vs GRID K260Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V4900 and GRID K260Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V4900 stacks up against GRID K260Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K260Q
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
GRID K260Q
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
GRID K260Q has 200% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 55 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
14−16
ultra / 1080p
1−2
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
16−18
50−55
medium / 1080p
6−7
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
90−95
180−190
ultra / 1080p
40−45
95−100
QHD / 1440p
24−27
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
65−70
140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
FirePro V4900 and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
90−95
ultra / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 80% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
18−20
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
95−100
medium / 1080p
12−14
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 147% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
1−2
9−10
low / 720p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
9−10
27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 237% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
35−40
75−80
high / 1080p
6−7
30−33
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
9−10
ultra / 1080p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
5−6
27−30
medium / 1080p
3−4
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
55−60
medium / 768p
10−11
30−35
high / 1080p
5−6
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 257% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 52% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
GRID K260Q
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Kepler
Code name
Turks
GK104
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 November 2011
28 June 2013
Pipelines
480
1536
Core clock speed
800 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
95.36
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
2,289 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
Check Price
