FirePro V4900 vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V4900 and Iris Plus Graphics 645, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V4900 stacks up against Iris Plus Graphics 645, check out specs charts below.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V4900 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - in Laptops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
4−5
ultra / 1080p
1−2
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
4−5
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
16−18
medium / 1080p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
medium / 768p
90−95
80−85
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
high / 768p
65−70
60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
12−14
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
70−75
65−70
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
3−4
5−6
ultra / 1080p
2−3
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
4−5
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
50−55
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
12−14
FirePro V4900 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Fortnite.
high / 1080p
7−8
8−9
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
9−10
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
40−45
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
7−8
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V4900 and Iris Plus Graphics 645 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V.
high / 1080p
2−3
3−4
ultra / 1080p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
5−6
7−8
medium / 1080p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
60−65
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Minecraft is 13% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 11% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
16−18
medium / 768p
10−11
12−14
high / 1080p
5−6
6−7
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 645 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
high / 768p
30−33
30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Code name
Turks
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 November 2011
10 July 2019
Pipelines
480
48
Core clock speed
800 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
50.40
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
