FirePro V4900 vs Iris Plus Graphics 655
When comparing FirePro V4900 and Iris Plus Graphics 655, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V4900 and Iris Plus Graphics 655 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V4900 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - in Laptops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 500 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 655 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
12−14
ultra / 1080p
1−2
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
27−30
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
6−7
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Battlefield 5 is 237% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
110−120
190−200
medium / 768p
90−95
160−170
ultra / 1080p
40−45
85−90
QHD / 1440p
24−27
45−50
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
65−70
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
low / 768p
70−75
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
85−90
ultra / 1080p
24−27
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
14−16
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
1−2
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Far Cry 5 is 240% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
85−90
medium / 1080p
12−14
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 123% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
16−18
QHD / 1440p
1−2
7−8
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
65−70
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
8−9
ultra / 1080p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
5−6
24−27
medium / 1080p
3−4
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
−
95−100
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
45−50
medium / 768p
10−11
27−30
high / 1080p
5−6
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 214% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
55−60
ultra / 1080p
14−16
30−35
high / 768p
30−33
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
Turks
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 November 2011
1 September 2017
Pipelines
480
48
Core clock speed
800 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
50.40
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.0
6.4
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
