FirePro V4900 vs NVS 810
In this comparison between FirePro V4900 and NVS 810 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V4900 will be the best choice, for others NVS 810 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
8x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V4900 has 10% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and NVS 810 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
NVS 810 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 102 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and NVS 810 - by 28 nm process technology.
NVS 810 is 35 mm longer, than FirePro V4900.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 2200 MHz higher, than NVS 810.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
1−2
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
4−5
4−5
FirePro V4900 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
16−18
medium / 1080p
6−7
6−7
FirePro V4900 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
90−95
95−100
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
high / 768p
65−70
65−70
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
65−70
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
70−75
80−85
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
FirePro V4900 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
2−3
2−3
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
10−12
medium / 1080p
4−5
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
10−12
10−11
ultra / 1080p
6−7
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
50−55
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Fortnite is 6% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
7−8
5−6
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
8−9
FirePro V4900 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
5−6
4−5
medium / 1080p
3−4
3−4
FirePro V4900 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
60−65
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
85−90
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 720p
6−7
6−7
FirePro V4900 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p
12−14
10−11
medium / 768p
10−11
8−9
high / 1080p
5−6
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p
85−90
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
high / 768p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than NVS 810.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
NVS 810
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Maxwell
Code name
Turks
GM107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 November 2011
4 November 2015
Pipelines
480
512
Core clock speed
800 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
33.06
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
2x 1,058 gflops
Length
163 mm
198 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
14.4 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
