FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K2000M
When choosing between FirePro V4900 and Quadro K2000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V4900 and Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V4900 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro K2000M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 55 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
1−2
ultra / 1080p
1−2
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
12−14
medium / 1080p
4−5
3−4
FirePro V4900 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
16−18
medium / 1080p
6−7
5−6
FirePro V4900 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
90−95
90−95
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
high / 768p
65−70
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
50−55
50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
2−3
2−3
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
10−12
medium / 1080p
4−5
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
10−12
10−11
ultra / 1080p
6−7
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
50−55
50−55
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Fortnite is 6% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
5−6
ultra / 1080p
6−7
5−6
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
9−10
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
40−45
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
1−2
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
5−6
5−6
medium / 1080p
3−4
3−4
FirePro V4900 and Quadro K2000M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
60−65
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
12−14
12−14
medium / 768p
10−11
8−9
high / 1080p
5−6
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
high / 768p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Kepler
Code name
Turks
N14P-Q3
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 November 2011
1 June 2012
Pipelines
480
384
Core clock speed
800 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
23.84
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
572.2 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
