FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K4000M
When comparing FirePro V4900 and Quadro K4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V4900 and Quadro K4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
Quadro K4000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4000M has 33% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K4000M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
1−2
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
21−24
medium / 1080p
4−5
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
110−120
170−180
medium / 768p
90−95
140−150
ultra / 1080p
40−45
70−75
QHD / 1440p
24−27
40−45
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
65−70
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p
70−75
95−100
medium / 768p
50−55
75−80
ultra / 1080p
24−27
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 48% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
12−14
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
27−30
medium / 1080p
4−5
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Far Cry 5 is 180% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
50−55
75−80
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 85% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 137% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
65−70
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
high / 1080p
6−7
20−22
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
7−8
ultra / 1080p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
5−6
20−22
medium / 1080p
3−4
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
high / 1080p
60−65
−
ultra / 1080p
−
90−95
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
35−40
medium / 768p
10−11
24−27
high / 1080p
5−6
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
ultra / 1080p
14−16
27−30
high / 768p
30−33
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 30% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
Quadro K4000M
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Kepler
Code name
Turks
N14E-Q3
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 November 2011
1 June 2012
Pipelines
480
960
Core clock speed
800 MHz
600 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
48.08
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
1,154 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
37 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
