FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K4200

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V4900 and Quadro K4200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V4900 stacks up against Quadro K4200, check out specs charts below.

FirePro V4900 Check Price

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4200 has 44% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K4200 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 29 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K4200 is 78 mm longer, than FirePro V4900.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 1400 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	1−2	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	6−7	35−40
ultra / 1080p	5−6	30−33
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	16−18	70−75
medium / 1080p	6−7	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 450% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V4900 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	230−240
medium / 768p	90−95	200−210
ultra / 1080p	40−45	120−130
QHD / 1440p	24−27	100−105
4K / 2160p	−	55−60
high / 768p	65−70	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 147% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	75−80	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	70−75	120−130
medium / 768p	50−55	110−120
ultra / 1080p	24−27	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 114% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	3−4	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
low / 720p	12−14	55−60
medium / 1080p	4−5	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 480% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	10−12	35−40
ultra / 1080p	6−7	27−30
QHD / 1440p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	130−140
medium / 1080p	12−14	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 247% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	7−8	35−40
ultra / 1080p	6−7	27−30
QHD / 1440p	1−2	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	18−20	70−75
medium / 1080p	9−10	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 387% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	95−100
high / 1080p	6−7	40−45
ultra / 1080p	3−4	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 186% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	5−6	40−45
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	60−65	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 43% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	75−80
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	6−7	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 333% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	12−14	80−85
medium / 768p	10−11	50−55
high / 1080p	5−6	27−30
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	2−3	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 428% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
high / 768p	30−33	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FirePro V4900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro K4200
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Code name	Turks	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 November 2011	22 July 2014
Pipelines	480	1344
Core clock speed	800 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock		784 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	87.81
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length	163 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	73 Mh/s	119 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares