FirePro V4900 vs Quadro M1200

In this comparison between FirePro V4900 and Quadro M1200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V4900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M1200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V4900 Check Price

Quadro M1200 Check Price

Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M1200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1200 here:

Quadro M1200 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro M1200
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	45 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 has 66% more power consumption, than Quadro M1200.
Quadro M1200 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1200 - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M1200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 191 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M1200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M1200 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	18−20
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	6−7	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	60−65
medium / 1080p	6−7	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V4900 and Quadro M1200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	220−230
medium / 768p	90−95	190−200
ultra / 1080p	40−45	110−120
QHD / 1440p	24−27	75−80
4K / 2160p	−	40−45
high / 768p	65−70	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 127% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	75−80	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	70−75	110−120
medium / 768p	50−55	100−110
ultra / 1080p	24−27	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Dota 2 is 98% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	3−4	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
low / 720p	12−14	45−50
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	10−12	30−33
ultra / 1080p	6−7	21−24
QHD / 1440p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	12−14	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Fortnite is 194% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	7−8	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	24−27
QHD / 1440p	1−2	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	18−20	60−65
medium / 1080p	9−10	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 325% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	35−40	85−90
high / 1080p	6−7	35−40
ultra / 1080p	3−4	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	2−3	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	5−6	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	60−65	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	12−14	65−70
medium / 768p	10−11	40−45
high / 1080p	5−6	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	2−3	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 328% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
high / 768p	30−33	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1200 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FirePro V4900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro M1200
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell
Code name	Turks	N17P-Q1
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 November 2011	13 January 2017
Pipelines	480	640
Core clock speed	800 MHz	991 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	1870 Million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops
Length	163 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	N/A
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	73 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
3D Stereo		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 vs Quadro M1200

Quadro M1200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares