FirePro V4900 vs Quadro M2000

In this comparison between FirePro V4900 and Quadro M2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V4900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V4900 Check Price

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 4 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M2000 is 38 mm longer, than FirePro V4900.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 2612 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	1−2	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	6−7	30−35
ultra / 1080p	5−6	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	16−18	65−70
medium / 1080p	6−7	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 412% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V4900 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	230−240
medium / 768p	90−95	200−210
ultra / 1080p	40−45	120−130
QHD / 1440p	24−27	90−95
4K / 2160p	−	50−55
high / 768p	65−70	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 144% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	75−80	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	70−75	120−130
medium / 768p	50−55	100−110
ultra / 1080p	24−27	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 108% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	3−4	24−27
ultra / 1080p	2−3	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
low / 720p	12−14	50−55
medium / 1080p	4−5	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 440% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	10−12	30−35
ultra / 1080p	6−7	24−27
QHD / 1440p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	120−130
medium / 1080p	12−14	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 217% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	7−8	35−40
ultra / 1080p	6−7	27−30
QHD / 1440p	1−2	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	18−20	70−75
medium / 1080p	9−10	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 387% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	95−100
high / 1080p	6−7	40−45
ultra / 1080p	3−4	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 182% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	2−3	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	5−6	40−45
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	60−65	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	6−7	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 333% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	12−14	75−80
medium / 768p	10−11	45−50
high / 1080p	5−6	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 385% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
high / 768p	30−33	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FirePro V4900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V4900	Quadro M2000
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Turks	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 November 2011	8 April 2016
Pipelines	480	768
Core clock speed	800 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	55.82
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length	163 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA		5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	73 Mh/s	215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares