Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro V4900 vs Quadro M4000M

    When comparing FirePro V4900 and Quadro M4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V4900 and Quadro M4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    FirePro V4900 Check Price
    Quadro M4000M Check Price

    Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:

    Quadro M4000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro V4900 Quadro M4000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro M4000M has 33% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
    • FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro M4000M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
    • FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
    • FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 175 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
    • FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 2−3 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 1−2 21−24
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
    4K / 2160p − 10−11
    low / 720p 12−14 60−65
    medium / 1080p 4−5 40−45
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than FirePro V4900.

    Full Specs

      FirePro V4900 Quadro M4000M
    Architecture TeraScale 2 Maxwell
    Code name Turks GM204
    Type Workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 1 November 2011 2 October 2015
    Pipelines 480 1,280
    Core clock speed 800 MHz 975 MHz
    Boost Clock 1013 MHz
    Transistor count 716 million 5,200 million
    Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 19.20 78.00
    Floating-point performance 768.0 gflops 2,496 gflops
    Length 163 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 4000 MHz 5012 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 64 GB/s 160 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12
    Shader Model 5.0 5.0
    OpenGL 4.4 4.5
    OpenCL 1.2 1.2
    Vulkan N/A 1.1.126
    CUDA 5.2
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 73 Mh/s 251 Mh/s
    Laptop size large
    Optimus +
    Display Port 1.2
    3D Vision Pro +
    Mosaic +
    nView Display Management +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares