FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R7 260

When comparing FirePro V4900 and Radeon R7 260, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V4900 and Radeon R7 260 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro V4900 Check Price

Radeon R7 260 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V4900	Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260 has 53% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 260 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260 - by 28 nm process technology.
Radeon R7 260 is 7 mm longer, than FirePro V4900.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 2375 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	1−2	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	4−5	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	50−55
medium / 1080p	6−7	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Battlefield 5 is 287% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	110−120	200−210
medium / 768p	90−95	170−180
ultra / 1080p	40−45	95−100
QHD / 1440p	24−27	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	65−70	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	75−80	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	50−55	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon R7 260.
low / 768p	70−75	110−120
medium / 768p	50−55	90−95
ultra / 1080p	24−27	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	3−4	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	1−2	6−7
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	10−12	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	18−20
QHD / 1440p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	95−100
medium / 1080p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Fortnite is 147% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	20−22
QHD / 1440p	1−2	9−10
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	9−10	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 237% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	35−40	75−80
high / 1080p	6−7	27−30
ultra / 1080p	3−4	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	2−3	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	5−6	27−30
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	60−65	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	24−27	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	12−14	50−55
medium / 768p	10−11	30−35
high / 1080p	5−6	18−20
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 242% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
high / 768p	30−33	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 52% more, than FirePro V4900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V4900	Radeon R7 260
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 2.0
Code name	Turks	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 November 2011	17 December 2013
Pipelines	480	768
Core clock speed	800 MHz
Boost Clock		1100 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	48.00
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	1,536 gflops
Length	163 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.3
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	73 Mh/s	240 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
DDMA audio		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R7 260

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares