FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R7 260X

In this comparison between FirePro V4900 and Radeon R7 260X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V4900 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V4900 Check Price

Radeon R7 260X Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V4900	Radeon R7 260X
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	115 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R7 260X has 53% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 260X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R7 260X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R7 260X - with GCN 2.0.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 260X - by 28 nm process technology.
Radeon R7 260X is 7 mm longer, than FirePro V4900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	1−2	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	4−5	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	6−7	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	50−55
medium / 1080p	6−7	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R7 260X.
low / 768p	110−120	210−220
medium / 768p	90−95	180−190
ultra / 1080p	40−45	100−110
QHD / 1440p	24−27	55−60
4K / 2160p	−	30−35
high / 768p	65−70	140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 107% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	75−80	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	50−55	45−50
FirePro V4900 and Radeon R7 260X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	70−75	110−120
medium / 768p	50−55	95−100
ultra / 1080p	24−27	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Dota 2 is 86% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	3−4	18−20
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	1−2	6−7
low / 720p	12−14	40−45
medium / 1080p	4−5	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Far Cry 5 is 320% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	10−12	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	20−22
QHD / 1440p	4−5	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Fortnite is 164% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	7−8	27−30
ultra / 1080p	6−7	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	18−20	55−60
medium / 1080p	9−10	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	35−40	75−80
high / 1080p	6−7	30−35
ultra / 1080p	3−4	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	2−3	10−11
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	5−6	30−35
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	60−65	−
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
low / 720p	24−27	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	30−33
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	12−14	55−60
medium / 768p	10−11	35−40
high / 1080p	5−6	20−22
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 285% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
high / 768p	30−33	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260X in World of Tanks is 54% more, than FirePro V4900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V4900	Radeon R7 260X
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN 2.0
Code name	Turks	Bonaire
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 November 2011	8 October 2013
Pipelines	480	896
Core clock speed	800 MHz
Boost Clock		1000 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	61.60
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	1,971 gflops
Length	163 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	104 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.3
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	73 Mh/s	225 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
Design		reference
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		5.16 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R7 260X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares