FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R9 M365X

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V4900 and Radeon R9 M365X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V4900 stacks up against Radeon R9 M365X, check out specs charts below.

FirePro V4900 Check Price

Radeon R9 M365X Check Price

Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:

Radeon R9 M365X Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V4900	Radeon R9 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 M365X has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M365X is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro V4900.
FirePro V4900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 2875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	6−7
ultra / 1080p	1−2	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	16−18
medium / 1080p	4−5	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	16−18	24−27
medium / 1080p	6−7	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Battlefield 5 is 87% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	35−40	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	110−120	130−140
medium / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
QHD / 1440p	24−27	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	65−70	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	75−80	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
medium / 1080p	50−55	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than Radeon R9 M365X.
low / 768p	70−75	80−85
medium / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	24−27	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	3−4	8−9
ultra / 1080p	2−3	7−8
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	18−20
medium / 1080p	4−5	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	10−12	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
QHD / 1440p	4−5	−
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Fortnite is 35% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−12
QHD / 1440p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	18−20	24−27
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
medium / 768p	35−40	45−50
high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	3−4	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	2−3	4−5
ultra / 1080p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	5−6	12−14
medium / 1080p	3−4	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
high / 1080p	60−65	85−90
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Minecraft is 22% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p	6−7	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	12−14	24−27
medium / 768p	10−11	16−18
high / 1080p	5−6	9−10
ultra / 1080p	4−5	6−7
4K / 2160p	2−3	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 85% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p	85−90	85−90
medium / 768p	35−40	45−50
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
high / 768p	30−33	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M365X in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FirePro V4900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V4900	Radeon R9 M365X
Architecture	TeraScale 2	GCN
Code name	Turks	Tropo
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 November 2011	6 May 2015
Pipelines	480	640
Core clock speed	800 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		925 MHz
Transistor count	716 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	37.00
Floating-point performance	768.0 gflops	1,184 gflops
Length	163 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	N/A
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	73 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		10
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V4900 vs Radeon R9 M365X

Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares