FirePro V4900 vs Tesla C2050
When comparing FirePro V4900 and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V4900 and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2050 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 226 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
FirePro V4900 and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 85 mm longer, than FirePro V4900.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 1000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
18−20
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
60−65
medium / 1080p
6−7
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
110−120
220−230
medium / 768p
90−95
190−200
ultra / 1080p
40−45
110−120
QHD / 1440p
24−27
70−75
4K / 2160p
−
35−40
high / 768p
65−70
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 123% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
100−110
ultra / 1080p
24−27
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
low / 720p
12−14
45−50
medium / 1080p
4−5
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
110−120
medium / 1080p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 182% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−12
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 312% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
35−40
85−90
high / 1080p
6−7
35−40
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
5−6
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
60−65
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
12−14
65−70
medium / 768p
10−11
40−45
high / 1080p
5−6
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
2−3
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 328% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FirePro V4900.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
Tesla C2050
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Fermi
Code name
Turks
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 November 2011
25 July 2011
Pipelines
480
448
Core clock speed
800 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
32.14
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
163 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
144.0 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
90 Mh/s
Check Price
