FirePro V4900 vs Tesla M2070 Q
When choosing between FirePro V4900 and Tesla M2070 Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V4900 and Tesla M2070 Q.
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
FirePro V4900
Tesla M2070 Q
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than FirePro V4900.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla M2070 Q has 5 GB more memory, than FirePro V4900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V4900 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 226 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
FirePro V4900 and Tesla M2070 Q are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla M2070 Q is 85 mm longer, than FirePro V4900.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V4900 is 868 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
3−4
ultra / 1080p
1−2
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
4−5
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
35−40
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro V4900 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
high / 768p
65−70
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
50−55
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V4900 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Tesla M2070 Q.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
50−55
55−60
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 10% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
3−4
4−5
ultra / 1080p
2−3
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
14−16
medium / 1080p
4−5
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 23% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
7−8
8−9
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
medium / 768p
35−40
−
high / 1080p
6−7
10−11
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
5−6
9−10
medium / 1080p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
60−65
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro V4900.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than FirePro V4900.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
6−7
8−9
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
FirePro V4900 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p
12−14
20−22
medium / 768p
10−11
12−14
high / 1080p
5−6
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than FirePro V4900.
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
high / 768p
30−33
30−35
FirePro V4900 and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
FirePro V4900
Tesla M2070 Q
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Fermi
Code name
Turks
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
1 November 2011
25 July 2011
Pipelines
480
448
Core clock speed
800 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
32.14
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
1,027.7 gflops
Length
163 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
73 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Check Price
