FirePro M4000 vs FirePro V5800
When choosing between FirePro M4000 and FirePro V5800, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and FirePro V5800.
FirePro V5800
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4000 | FirePro V5800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 74 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 124% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and FirePro V5800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M4000 and FirePro V5800 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro V5800 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and FirePro V5800 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 90 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FirePro V5800 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 23% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4000 and FirePro V5800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 19% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 22% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4000 | FirePro V5800 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Cape Verde GLM | Juniper |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 July 2012 | 26 April 2010 |
| Pipelines | 512 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 690 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 27.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,104.0 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| Check Price |